http://www.dnronline.com/news_details.php?AID=35717&CHID=1Lohr’s Proposal To Freeze School Standards Moves To Senate Floor
By Jeff Mellott

HARRISONBURG - The House Of Delegates Courts of Justice Committee approved a bill by Sen. Mark Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, to redefine Virginia’s triggerman law.

On Friday, the committee sent the bill to the full House by a vote of 17-5, with committee member Del. Todd Gilbert, R-Woodstock, among those in favor. Gilbert has a similar bill that’s advanced to the full Senate for consideration in that body.

The bills would amend Virginia law to allow accomplices in a capital crime to be considered for the death penalty. The bills are designed to combat gang-related crimes, according to their supporters.

Both bills passed the General Assembly last year but Gov. Timothy M. Kaine vetoed the legislation.

Obenshain’s bill was not the only piece of legislation sponsored by Valley lawmakers to advance in recent days.

On Thursday, the Senate Education and Health Committee voted 15-0 to send a bill by Del. Matt Lohr, R-Broadway, to the full Senate that would keep in place until June 30, 2010, the current standards schools must meet to become fully accredited. 

“As school divisions work through these tough budget cuts, this bill will offer a small reprieve from escalating standards,” Lohr said in a prepared statement issued Thursday.

The committee, also acting on Thursday, voted 15-0 to send to the full Senate Lohr’s bill requiring the creation of a standard consent form for the clients of midwives. The legislation stated aim is to expectant mothers aware of all health risks associated with home-birth deliveries. 

This bill aims to protect the welfare of both the mother and child, Lohr has said.

Contact Jeff Mellott at 574-6290 or jmellott@dnronline.com

Tags :

http://knox.villagesoup.com/AandE/story.cfm?storyID=147093

(Feb 21): The Maternal Wellness Center in Belfast is screening several films that offer new ways to look at the childbirth process.  

At 2:30 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 28, Morningstar Midwifery/Maternal Wellness Center of Belfast and Camden Public Library will co-sponsor a screening of the 2008 documentary “Orgasmic Birth” in the library’s Jean Picker Room, Atlantic Avenue.

The 87-minute film will be followed by a discussion with the community and local birthing professionals. The event is free and open to the public, and refreshments will be served.

Joyous, sensuous and revolutionary, “Orgasmic Birth” brings the ultimate challenge to our cultural myths by inviting viewers to see the emotional, spiritual and physical heights attainable through birth. The film features commentary by Christiane Northrup, M.D., and midwives Ina May Gaskin, Elizabeth Davis and other experts in the field; and stunning moments of women in the ecstatic release of childbirth.

Donna Broderick and Ellie Daniels are Certified Professional Midwives with Morningstar Midwifery and will be available, along with other local midwives, doulas and birth educators, to answer questions after the screenings.

“Americans are bombarded with images of birth as a scary, medicalized emergency. ‘Orgasmic Birth’ is one of a number of refreshing new films coming out that depict it as the safe, spiritual, joyful journey it can be when women get good support and care,” said Broderick.

The community is invited to participate in the lively discussion to follow.

Three-part series at Belfast Free Library
Morningstar Midwifery/the Maternal Wellness Center also is sponsoring Other Images of Birth, a three-part spring film series, on the first Wednesday of every month, March through May. Screenings, along with community discussions, will be held from 6 to 8 p.m. Wednesdays March 4, April 1 and May 6 in the Abbott Room of Belfast Free Library, 106 High St. All events are free and open to the public, and refreshments will be served.

The first event in the series will be a local birth “Artivists” Night on March 4, with a film and poetry reading by two Belfast birth artists and activists followed by a moderated panel and community discussion.

The film shown will be “ROAR” (2009) by local filmmaker and homebirth mother Nicolle Littrell, who created the 13-minute work as a video meditation on the state of birth and a call for change. The female voice is at the center as interviews with Maine midwives and legislators are interwoven with stunning homebirth footage.

The film will be followed by a brief poetry reading of birth poems by Arielle Greenberg, a Chicago-based poet who is currently in Belfast, working on an oral history of the new back-to-the-land movement and a consumer’s guide to working with midwives. Greenberg is the author of two poetry collections and co-editor of two poetry anthologies. There will be plenty of time for discussion afterward.

The second event will be a screening of the 2008 feature-length documentary “Pregnant in America” on April 1. Shocked by the greed of U.S. hospitals, insurance companies and medical organizations, filmmaker Steve Buonagurio and his wife Mandy set out to have a natural home birth in a world where everything is anything but natural. The film is entertaining as it is educational and is high on emotional content.

The final event will be another showing of “Orgasmic Birth” on May 6.

The Maternal Wellness Center, located at 111 High St. in Belfast, was created last winter with the mission of creating a community-centered, accessible and secure center for multiple uses associated with pregnancy, birth, women’s wellness, parenting support and health and wellness for babies and children. For more information, call Arielle Bywater at 338-0708 between 1 and 4 p.m. Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Tags :

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009902240366

By ERIN MADISON • Tribune Staff Writer • February 24, 2009

Kim Miller wasn’t too keen on the idea of delivering her baby in the hospital.

“I’m not sick,” said Miller, who always has felt hospitals are for people who are ill.

Instead Kim and her husband Jeff are planning to have their first child, who is due in June, at the Family Birth Center in Great Falls with midwife Traci Palagi delivering.

“I just feel birth is a natural thing,” Miller said.

Rather than the hustle and bustle of a hospital, the Millers will have the Family Birth Center, located just off Exit 0, to themselves. They’re welcome to have family and friends there, but the Millers want it just to be the two of them, Palagi and her assistants, and eventually their new baby. To celebrate after the birth, the couple plans to have a champagne cake from Hempl’s Bakery on hand, Jeff’s favorite dessert.

The Millers like the flexibility a birth center offers.

“Women in Great Falls have every option available to them,” said Palagi, who practices in Great Falls and Helena. “I don’t know if they know that.”

They can give birth in the hospital with a doctor, do a hospital birth with a midwife, have a home birth or give birth in a birth center.

“It’s pretty much whatever they feel most comfortable with,” she said.

Women do better through labor and delivery when they are somewhere they feel comfortable. For some people that’s a hospital. For others, it might be their living room.

Holistic Care

Midwives work with expectant mothers all through their pregnancies.

The prenatal care is similar to what women receive with an obstetrician. They have about the same schedule for appointments and run most of the same tests a doctor would.

 

But the visits are much longer, Palagi said. She spends an hour or more at each appointment.

“We spend so much time and really get to know our patients,” she said.

“It’s just so much more personal than a doctor’s office,” Miller said.

MaryAnn Brown, direct entry midwife, checks patients’ blood pressure, weight, urine, does a blood panel, tests for common bacteria and screens for maternal diabetes during prenatal visits. She also educates patients about childbirth, talks about family dynamics and lifestyle changes, such as diet and exercise.

Because midwives spend so much time with their patients, they will know long ahead of time if there are any risk factors, said Elaine Becker, certified nurse midwife who owns the Family Birth Center. In those cases, they transfer the patient to an obstetrician-gynecologist or other doctor.

“Way before they labor, they’re transferred to somebody who can take care of them,” Becker said.

Low-risk births

Midwives don’t accept women who are considered high-risk or who have complications, Palagi said.

If an unexpected problem arises during labor and delivery, Becker has a plan in place to have the patient transferred to Benefis Health System.

Nationally, about 12 percent of patients who begin labor at a birth center are transferred to a hospital, according to the American Association of Birth Centers. But only about 2 percent of patients go to the hospital as emergency transports.

“There’s a time and a place for hospitals,” Becker said. “The vast majority of pregnant women do not need that level of care.”

 

Adria Strable had her first two children at Benefis with Becker as the midwife.

She had her third child, Courtney Belle, at the Family Birth Center in December.

The Family Birth Center is decorated much like a house and feels more like a home than a doctor’s office. It has two birth rooms with large beds and private bathrooms. There’s also an exam room.

At first Strable was a little concerned with the idea of not delivering at the hospital, but she and her husband Greg were put at ease when Becker told them it took only eight minutes from the time she dialed 9-1-1 to when Adria would arrive at the hospital. Plus, Strable was very confident with Becker.

In the end, the Strables were very happy with their experience at the birth center.

The atmosphere there was totally different than at the hospital, Adria Strable said.

Strable had Becker’s undivided attention at the birth center, she said.

After Courtney was born, Becker didn’t ever take her out of the room and she even let the couple’s two older daughters help bathe the baby.

“This was a lot more personal attention,” Greg Strable said.

Different techniques

MaryAnn Brown, direct entry midwife, doesn’t offer any pain medication during labor. Midwives believe that it can be harmful to the baby, she said.

Instead, she helps her patients develop relaxation techniques and also will rub their backs and use other methods to make them more comfortable during childbirth.

 

Adria Strable didn’t ever wish she could use pain medicine during her delivery. Instead, she listened to music and focused on something other than the pain.

Part of the difference in having a home birth or a birth center birth is that women aren’t hooked up to a monitor or intravenous fluids (IV), Palagi said. Instead, they can walk around and be in whatever position is most comfortable for them, whether it’s sitting, standing, lying down or on their hands and knees.

If women listen to their body during labor, they’ll know what position they need to be in to make the delivery easier, Palagi said.

Instead of having women hooked up to a monitor during labor, most midwives use a hand-held Doppler ultrasound device to monitor the baby’s heartbeat.

The Family Birth Center has large, deep bathtubs where women can soak during labor, which helps some women cope with the pain.

Palagi and Brown both offer water births where women give birth in a shallow pool of warm water. Some midwives believe water births are gentler for the baby, but Palagi feels it’s just a matter of the mother’s comfort.

Home births

When Palagi does a home birth, women can deliver wherever they feel comfortable. Sometimes that’s in the bathtub or bedroom or sometimes things happen so quickly that women will deliver wherever they happen to be.

Whenever Becker delivers a baby, she tries to have the mom reach down and pull the baby directly to her chest.

In the case of a home birth, Brown has her patients purchase a package of disposable supplies, which helps keep the mess contained.

“In a half an hour I can make it look like there wasn’t a birth,” Brown said.

After the delivery, Palagi stays with the mother and baby for about four hours.

“That’s the busiest part of my job because now there are two people,” she said.

Palagi makes sure the mom’s bleeding is normal and that the baby’s vitals are normal. Then she helps get breastfeeding started.

Brown sees her patients at least three times postpartum. She checks in on how nursing is going, how the mom’s energy level is and how she’s recovering.

Problems with mainstream care

One of the main theories of midwifery is that pregnancy is a natural, normal process, Becker said.

That’s something that many midwives feel that mainstream medicine has moved away from.

“Nationally the C-section rate is skyrocketing,” Becker said.

A high Caesarean section rate is a sign that something isn’t working as well as it should, she said.

The United States rates 41st for maternal mortality in the world, Brown said.

The countries that rate the best for infant mortality use a midwifery model of care, Becker said.

In addition to rising C-section rates, the cost of health care, including labor and delivery is ballooning.

On average in Montana, a vaginal birth without complications along with a normal newborn stay at the hospital costs about $6,000, according to Montana Informed Patient. That doesn’t include prenatal and postpartum care.

 

Palagi charges about $2,500 for labor and delivery, prenatal and postpartum care for a home birth.

Insurance typically covers midwives. Both Palagi and Becker have patients pay them upfront and submit bills to their insurance companies for reimbursement.

When the Millers contacted their insurance company about midwifery coverage, the insurance company was very supportive, Kim Miller said.

Overall, Adria Strable was pleased with the care she received from Becker at the Family Birth Center.

“I would do it again in a heartbeat,” she said.

And she probably will get the opportunity. The Strables are already making plans for baby No. 4.

Tags :

27/02/2009 8:42:00 AM
THE Rural Doctors Association of Australia (RDAA) has welcomed the Australian Department of Health and Ageing’s Maternity Services Review Report, released recently by Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, saying it provides a strong way forward for improving access to maternity services in the bush.RDAA chief executive officer, Steve Sant, said maternity services in rural areas have been under increasing pressure over the past decade with at least 50 per cent of rural maternity units closed down

“Pregnant rural women are increasingly having to travel great distances to give birth,” Mr Sant said.

“Indigenous women also continue to have much worse birthing outcomes.

The Maternity Services Review Report provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to focus urgently on getting much-needed maternity services back into the bush.

“Many studies have shown that it is very safe for mothers to give birth in rural centres and, for low-risk births, actually safer than the large metropolitan hospitals,” Mr Sant said.

“What is needed now is a strong commitment from the federal and state governments to reopen and support maternity units in rural Australia.”

Following the release of the report Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, announced major potential reforms for Australian maternity services, including Medicare access for midwives.

Reforming childbirth is a political battle that has spanned generations, involved 38 state and federal inquiries.

Mother of four and New South Wales State President of Maternity Coalition, Lisa Metcalf, said the Australian Medical Association has shown how out of step it is with the needs of women by objecting to improving services.

“We note that women will not be able to make a full complement of choice, and that there is the potential for homebirth to become illegal (come July 2010 when national registration of all health providers requires indemnity insurance),“ said Ms Metcalfe.

“We are confident that Minister Roxon will not allow this. We believe she will work with groups like ours to ensure all birthing options remain available to all women. By enabling private homebirths we will see not only a more cost effective private insurance option, but one that is more supportive of the needs of modern women.

Vice-president of Maternity Coalition, Melissa Fox, said most health ministers have ignored the needs of women and their families, further entrenching a maternity system focussed on the needs of practitioners and ‘organisational through-put’.

“We applaud Minister Roxon for starting this valuable process and will work with her to implement reforms that place all women in the centre of any service, whether they be birthing in labour wards, birth centres or within their own homes,” said Ms Fox.

“We hope that by implementing midwifery reform, slowly the broken system can be repaired. Pregnant and birthing women can have the option to have their care provided by one midwife they know and trust,” said Ms Fox.

Tags :

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25124579-601,00.html

Adam Cresswell, Health editor | March 02, 2009

Article from:  The Australian

HUNDREDS of women each year who choose to give birth in their homes are likely to face greater medical danger for themselves and their babies with the introduction of regulations that could force the practice underground.

From the middle of next year, midwives will be required to hold professional indemnity insurance as a condition of practice, under the Rudd Government’s plan to streamline registration requirements for all health professionals.

No commercial insurer has been prepared to offer an insurance policy to an independent midwife since the medical indemnity and wider insurance crises of 2001. When the new regime comes into effect, it will no longer be legal for these uninsured independent midwives to attend home births. The only exception will be if the midwife is employed by one of the very few publicly funded services, thought to be fewer than half a dozen nationwide.

Although the number of women giving birth at home is tiny in Australia - just over 700 in 2006, or 0.26 per cent of all births - this represents a committed group. More than 50 per cent of submissions to the federal Government’s recent maternity services review came from women calling for greater support for homebirthing services, which claim up to a 10-fold greater share of births in some overseas countries such as Britain.

Since 2001, an estimated 150 midwives have provided homebirth services to women, at a typical cost of between $3000 and $5000, but without rebates from Medicare or private health funds, and without insurance cover that would give recourse to compensation should anything go wrong.

Midwifery experts, consumer advocates for homebirthing and even some obstetricians are calling for the problem to be sorted out before midwives are forced out of homebirths.

Sarah McLean, a volunteer with the Homebirth Access Sydney consumer group, is pregnant with her third baby and is planning to deliver at home. She said the prospect of losing the option of homebirth was “quite devastating”.

“It’s ridiculous to effectively make homebirth illegal, when other countries like Britain have publicly funded homebirth programs,” Ms McLean said.

Caroline Homer, professor of midwifery at the University of Technology Sydney, said the “worst-case scenario is that women would be unattended” when giving birth.

“Another scenario is that the midwives will continue to practise under other names, but there won’t be any standards of care, and no peer review or evaluation, because it will all be in secret,” Professor Homer said.

“Removing independent midwives and saying we won’t do homebirths won’t solve the problem; women will continue to have babies at home.”

Obstetrician Andrew Bisits, director of obstetrics at Newcastle’s John Hunter Hospital, said there was no reason that the federal Government should not support midwives’ indemnity costs as it already did for obstetricians and other doctors.

Between 2003 and 2006, the federal Government subsidised doctors’ premiums to the tune of $54.39 million.

“If that’s denied, you will have a number of people going underground, making these very fragile, secretive arrangements,” he said. “It’s much more sensible to be positive about it.”

Homebirth supporters had been hoping the Maternity Services Review would solve the problem by recommending federal support for midwife indemnity.

In the event, the report said homebirthing was “a sensitive and controversial issue” and the “relationship between maternity healthcare professionals is not such as to support homebirth as a mainstream commonwealth-funded option (at least in the short term)”.

Evidence for the safety of homebirths is disputed. US research published in the British Medical Journal in 2005 found low-risk women giving birth at home with midwife supervision had lower rates of medical interventions, such as the use of forceps, and no greater risk of their baby dying either during birth or soon afterwards.

Tags :

http://blogs.smh.com.au/lifestyle/whosyourdaddy/archives/2009/02/i_love_the_word_home.html

I love the word “home”, with all its connotations of familiarity and Gemutlichkeit. I also love the word “birth”, with its suggestion of hope and new beginnings. When you put those two words together, however, the effect is confronting.

In this age of reason (well, mostly), there is something stubbornly anti-modern about homebirths. I mean, with all the advances of modern medicine, and with the ensuing drastic decline in infant mortality rates, why would you choose to have a baby at home?

One couple who wanted a homebirth were John Polson and Amanda Harding. For a few years now, the couple have been based in Brooklyn, and at 2am on Boxing Day they had their first child, a girl, named Harper.

“We didn’t want to do the hospital thing,” says Polson, the film director and Tropfest founder, currently in Sydney choosing the 16 finalists for this year’s festival. “America’s reputation for pulling out the scalpel and doing a c-section is horrific. We didn’t want that. So we did it at home with a midwife.”

Now there’s courage.

Don’t get me wrong. I love the idea of a homebirth. More to the point, so does my wife. Back in 2005, for the birth of the bundle that turned out to be Edie, Jo seriously contemplated the notion of a home delivery. Instead, she booked into RPA’s birthing centre, which we figured would be a bit of a compromise between labour ward and homebirth. Well, that was the plan, but Edie was three weeks overdue, so Jo was belatedly told that the birthing centre was out of the question.

The delivery ward it was, and what followed was intensive induction with intravenous hormones, extended foetal monitoring via a belt around Jo’s middle and, ultimately, an epidural. Jo was a whisker away from an emergency caesarean when, miraculously, our monkey was born. If Edie had arrived by c-section, she wouldn’t have been alone: nearly one in three Aussie kids now enter the world with the help of a scalpel.

In our pre-natal classes, Jo and I had been warned about the cascade of medical intervention: how induction can lead to epidural, for instance, which in turn can lead to c-section. In our case, all was well that ended well, but even so I was left wondering whether all the intervention had been necessary. In much the same spirit, actress Ricki Lake has made a film about her child’s birth called The Business of Being Born.

To counter the medicalisation of birth, organisations such as Homebirth Australia have been established: “a group of consumers and midwives committed to ensuring the survival of homebirth as a birth option for Australian women, with the overall aim of public funded homebirth across the country.” Also helpful is Homebirth Access Sydney, which provides midwife profiles and sells birthing pools.

So, how did Polson find the homebirth of his first child?

“I can’t speak for my wife, but there were times when I wanted an epidural,” he laughs. “But I caught the baby, and there was none of this shoving-needles-in stuff. It just happened there in our bedroom, and an hour later, the three of us were lying in our bed together thinking, ‘What just happened?’

“I’m very pro-homebirth,” he says, still exuding the wide-eyed delight of newfound fatherhood. “I want to get the word out there.”

Tags :

http://www.daventrytoday.co.uk/business/Helping-you-prepare-for-your.4875250.jp

Published Date: 15 January 2009
AN INDEPENDENT midwife is offering a personalised experience to expecting mothers.
Sue Kinross is a qualified midwife from Long Buckby who left the NHS to try and give mothers and fathers-to-be a more personal, relaxed, friendly and less stressful option for advice and care during and just after their pregnancy.

Mrs Kinross said: “I used to work for the NHS, but have been independent now for three years.

“Independent midwives can provide far more individualised care, also a lot of my clients have an independent midwife so they can guarantee a homebirth.

“The NHS is limited in the number of homebirths it can provide for, so it can’t guarantee a midwife for them.

“What is common these days is as soon as a woman finds out she’s pregnant she goes to her GP – but being pregnant is not a medical condition, it’s something natural and part of a woman’s life.

“Clearly the health of an expecting mother is important, but I think we’ve medicalised pregnancy.”

Mrs Kinross set up her company, Birthbundles, from her home and now covers an area stretching from Leicester to the south of Northamptonshire.

She said: “I can meet 10 times with one of my clients during their pregnancy, at their home and at times including evenings or weekends to suit them or their partner, and each visit can be one or two hours long.

“With the NHS midwives are employed by hospitals and you might get four or six visits, all about 15 minutes long.

“Many expecting mums and their partners also want to go to classes to help them prepare for the labour and birth and learn parenting skills. But it can be really hard to find spaces on these classes with the NHS and many end up using the National Childbirth Trust.

“Once labour starts I’ll get there and stay until they’ve given birth. And I’ll visit, every day if necessary, afterwards to help with all those things new parents have to cope with.”

Mrs Kinross says her aim is to offer expectant mothers a real friend to help her become a parent.

Tags :

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=8997

By Pamela Owen/Petra Cooke, Reporters
Email: newburytoday@newburynews.co.uk
Phone: 01635 564533
More News | Back to homepage

New mums can now pop along to the supermarket for fruit and veg and to weigh-in their newborn tots

NEW mums can now weigh-in their newborn tots at a post-natal clinic in a local supermarket while getting life’s little essentials.
The Royal Berkshire NHS has now extended their services to the Sainsbury’s Savacentre in Calcot by providing post-natal clinics in the store.
Twice a week mothers will be able to take their babies to the advisory clinics while doing a spot of grocery shopping, meeting friends or even popping along to see the chemist.
The mastermind behind the idea and community manager of the NHS, Lesley Oliver, said: “It’s in a community setting and easily accessible and mothers can combine it with shopping or meeting friends.
“Until now the mothers will have waited at home for a community midwife to visit them or come into the hospital.”
The clinic is housed in the Sainsbury’s store on the first floor and mums are met by NHS staff who take them to a private room.
Babies aged between two and ten-days-old are eligible and mums will be given a time for their appointment after their first home-visit.
Qualified mid-wives then weigh the baby and are able to offer breastfeeding support and offer advice to the mothers.
Carley Bertous, aged 19, who lives nearby in Calcot, was the first mum to visit the store with her son Alfie, who is only 10 days-old.
Miss Bertous, who had a water-birth, said: “It’s so convenient to come here because I can do my shopping at the same time and it’s an opportunity to get out the house rather than wait for a mid-wife to come and see me.
“I was also able to register the birth at the West Berkshire Council office which is right next door, so it’s very convenient.”
Tricia Watkins, spokeswoman for Sainsbury’s, said the store is constantly striving to get involved with the community.
She said: “It made sense for the clinic to be here because it makes their lives easier. We sell baby products and there is also a pharmacist in-store.”
However group co-ordinator for the Newbury Homebirth, Charlotte Gander, said she believed that newborns should stay at home during their first few days.
She said: “I think this is a great service for women who would have otherwise had to travel across Reading to the hospital.
“But as a mum of three myself I believe that those early days are best spent snuggled at home getting to know your new baby.
“It is good women are being offered this choice but visits in the home should never be lost.”
The clinic is open every Tuesday and Thursday from noon to 2pm.

Tags :

http://www.wptv.com/content/health/mb/story/Home-or-hospital-booth/WmZLY50CEU6BWVRcLheSvw.cspx

Reported by: Roxanne Stein
Email: rstein@wptv.com
Last Update: 1/22 9:02 am

HOME OR HOSPITAL BIRTH? REPORT #1531

BACKGROUND: Homebirths have been around as long as humans, but since the 1950s, the majority of American women have chosen to give birth in hospitals. In fact, about 99 percent of all the babies delivered in the United States are born in hospitals.

A NEW TREND? Many midwives around the country say more and more women are opting for homebirths. According to a recent New York Times article, midwives in New York City say they have been swamped with calls and requests. Some midwives have reported having to increase their workload from between two and four deliveries a month to as many as 10. The article says that the company yourwaterbirth.com, one of the biggest online suppliers of birthing pools, reports its sales have doubled since last year. The reason for this newfound interest in giving birth at home is not known, but many midwives believe women are looking for more natural delivery options. They want control over the process, which they don’t believe they can get at a hospital. Many of these women also fear being pressured into unnecessary surgery and/or other medical procedures. The number of C-sections has increased by 50 percent in recent years.

BENEFITS OF HOMEBIRTHS: Homebirths are often cheaper and allow families and friends to take part. An average vaginal birth at home costs about 60 percent less than it would at a hospital. Many women also like the idea of delivering and recovering at home where it’s more comfortable and familiar.

AGAINST HOMEBIRTH: Since 1975, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has officially opposed homebirths, identifying hospitals as the safest places for childbirth. This year, the American Medical Association has taken a similar position. Experts say even low-risk deliveries can have dangerous, unexpected complications. Catherine Lynch, M.D., an OB/GYN in Tampa, Fla., told Ivanhoe, “Even birth centers that are across the street from the hospital are not in the hospital itself, and you’ve got a lag time. You’ve got a delay that could be profound for mom and baby.” Although many studies provide conflicting data, most experts agree that about 16 percent of women planning to give birth at home are transferred to a hospital for delivery. One other British study found about 40 percent of first-time moms were transferred to a hospital. Doctors say a homebirth is definitely not for you if you are diabetic, have high blood pressure or experience pre-term labor.

Tags :

http://www.pr.com/press-release/128486

Louise Wilby and Anja Metzner, Tunbridge Wells’ most local and experienced independent midwives have joined forces to form Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives. Women will be able to choose between the increasingly stretched maternity service and individualised and woman-centred midwifery care from two dedicated homebirth midwives.

Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom, January 26, 2009 –(PR.com)– Louise Wilby, midwife of 20 years, lecturer and reflexologist and Anja Metzner, dedicated homebirth midwife since 2004 have joined to form Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives.

Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives offers continuity-of-care from two midwives, all midwifery care in the clients’ home, 24hour on-call service and extensive postnatal support until 6 weeks post birth.

The latest government paper, Maternity Matters, has promised women choice of place of birth and more importantly promises that ‘every woman will be supported by a midwife she knows and trusts throughout pregnancy and after birth’. Unfortunately, the local midwives are currently not able to offer continuity of care yet.

Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives enables women to choose the best care available: continuity of care from two dedicated midwives, labour support in the privacy of the home, support and advocacy in case of hospital transfer and extensive postnatal support.

Anja Metzner explains ‘We pride ourselves on given women and couples time, commitment and a superior level of care. Women tell us they feel supported, empowered and confident.

Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives covers most of West Kent and parts of East Sussex.

Anja and Louise are happy to discuss individual circumstances and advice on the best level of care.

For additional information on private midwifery care in Tunbridge Wells and surrounding area contact Anja Metzner or visit www.tunbridgewellsindependentmidwives.co.uk

Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives offers gold standard maternity care for women in Kent and Sussex.

Contact:
Anja Metzner, Independent Midwife
Tunbridge Wells Independent Midwives
0044- 01825 714538
http:// www.tunbridgewellsindependentmidwives.co.uk

Tags :